Question
Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic?(1 point) Responses A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will make controlling factions easier. A single large republic will make controlling factions easier. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The best summary of the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic is: **A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.**
Anti-Federalists believed that a large republic would be too diverse and geographically expansive to adequately represent the interests and voices of individual citizens, leading to a disconnect between the government and the populace.
Anti-Federalists believed that a large republic would be too diverse and geographically expansive to adequately represent the interests and voices of individual citizens, leading to a disconnect between the government and the populace.
Related Questions
Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a sin...
Which if the following best summarizes the logic used by the anti federalists to argue against a sin...
Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a sin...
which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the anti federalists to argue against a sin...