Which of the following best predicts what could have happened if Article X had not been removed from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Tejanos living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.
Tejanos living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.

Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.
Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.

Indigenous groups would have been able to keep their land.
Indigenous groups would have been able to keep their land.

Anglos living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.

Answer 1

To determine which option best predicts the potential outcome if Article X had not been removed from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, it's important to consider the context of that article. Article X originally included provisions to protect the land rights of Mexicans (Tejanos) and Indigenous peoples who lived in the territories ceded by Mexico to the U.S.

By removing Article X, many Mexicans and Tejanos found it more difficult to defend their land claims, leading to widespread dispossession of their lands. Indigenous groups also faced challenges regarding their land rights due to the U.S. expansion and settlement policies.

Given this context, the best prediction would likely be:

Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.

This option most directly addresses the former landowners, specifically those who were Mexican citizens or descendants, whose claims would have been bolstered by the protections that Article X initially provided.