Which of the following best explains how the causes and effects of the arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa were similar?(1 point) Responses

Question

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s ally support, which led to less destructive wars.
The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s ally support, which led to less destructive wars.

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s power through weapons, which led to an arms control treaty.
The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s power through weapons, which led to an arms control treaty.

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to show that the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s military equipment was superior, which led to peace agreements.
The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to show that the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s military equipment was superior, which led to peace agreements.

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to increase the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s regional influence through their military supply, which led to increased violence.

Answer 1

The best explanation for how the causes and effects of the arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa were similar is:

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to increase the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s regional influence through their military supply, which led to increased violence.

This response accurately captures the context of the Cold War, where both the U.S. and the Soviet Union aimed to expand their influence through military support and arms, often leading to heightened conflict and violence in those regions.