Which of the following best explains how the causes and effects of the arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa were similar?(1 point)

Question

Responses

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s power through weapons, which led to an arms control treaty.
The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s power through weapons, which led to an arms control treaty.

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s ally support, which led to less destructive wars.
The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to expand the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s ally support, which led to less destructive wars.

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to increase the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s regional influence through their military supply, which led to increased violence.
The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to increase the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s regional influence through their military supply, which led to increased violence.

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to show that the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s military equipment was superior, which led to peace agreements.

Answer 1

The best response that explains how the causes and effects of the arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa were similar is:

The arms race and proxy wars in the Middle East and Africa both sought to increase the U.S.’s and Soviet Union’s regional influence through their military supply, which led to increased violence.

This response captures the essence of both phenomena by noting how they were driven by the desire for influence and power, ultimately resulting in heightened conflict and violence in the regions involved.