Judicial activism is generally considered warranted by the Supreme Court "when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues." This approach allows the Court to interpret the Constitution in ways that may reflect contemporary values and address significant legal and social issues.
When is judicial activism warranted by the Supreme Court?(1 point) Responses
if a case is highly publicized in the media
in any case that is appealed to it
when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues
if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court
1 answer
1 answer