Judicial activism is generally warranted by the Supreme Court when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues. This requires the court to interpret the Constitution and address rights or issues that may not be adequately covered by existing laws or precedents.
When is judicial activism warranted by the Supreme Court?(1 point)
Responses
if a case is highly publicized in the media
if a case is highly publicized in the media
if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court
if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court
in any case that is appealed to it
in any case that is appealed to it
when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues
when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues
1 answer