Judicial activism is typically warranted by the Supreme Court when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues. This reflects the court's role in interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that justice is served, particularly in cases where rights or legal precedents may be at stake.
When is judicial activism warranted by the Supreme Court?(1 point)
Responses
in any case that is appealed to it
in any case that is appealed to it
if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court
if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court
when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues
when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues
if a case is highly publicized in the media
1 answer
1 answer