When facing the threat that a country

might be developing chemical and
biological weapons of mass destruction
for use by terrorists groups, a
libertarian would most likely:

A. oppose any military action by the
U.S. because libertarians are
pacifists.
B. oppose any military action by the
U.S. unless the United States was
directly attacked.
C. support military action, but only
if carried out with the approval
of the United Nations.
D. support military action, but only
if American troops were joined by
troops from European nations.

It is either B OR C. Can you help,
and give input to what the correct answer is? Thanks!

On that one I would go with your B. A strict libertarian , I do not believe, would worry about the UN.

Similar Questions
  1. Which of the following presents ethical concerns of biological warfare?Biological weapons are not effective Biological weapons
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Paraphase this using basic english languageChemical and biological warfare are seen as important aspects of modern warfare due
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Paraphase this using basic english languageChemical and biological warfare are seen as important aspects of modern warfare due
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Read the following hypothetical international situation.Nation A did not attend the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1997 and did
    1. answers icon 3 answers
more similar questions