I disagree.
Each witness has a different viewpoint and some may contradict others.
When a number of different witnesses provide descriptions of the suspect, it is considered:
A. acceptable for speed and brevity to combine multiple descriptions into a composite description.
B. good investigative tactics to combine multiple descriptions into a composite description to create less confusion.
C. unacceptable to combine multiple descriptions into a composite description, since doing so creates a chain-of-custody problem.
D. unacceptable to combine multiple descriptions into a composite description, since doing so could hinder the prosecution.
I think it's A, but not sure.
1 answer