Bungalows are small, inexpensive houses that working people could afford to buy.
"Craftsman" is an aesthetic style, which may be used in buildings large or small, but usually associated with smaller houses. But that's a style, not measure of affordability. The Progressive Era was a populist era with most efforts aimed at protecting working people, small investors, etc. so small affordable houses fit into that ideal.
What different attributes made "Craftsman" style houses and bungalows "Progressive"? How did different Progressive reformers see the bungalows differently? (What problems did they think the bungalows would fix?)
4 answers
I'd look up a web site, but my WiFi is slow tonight for some reason. Type "bungalow" and "Craftsman style architecture" into your browser and see what comes up.
Thanks Reed, I already figured it out a few seconds after I had posted the question. But I do appreciate your help.
Good for you!