What are two traits of an information source that may indicate the information given is scientifically unreliable?

Answer: peer review does not necessarily indicate that the other field expert reviews are in agreement with conclusions of the original writer, and a well researched publication on material that is sponsored by large corporation can be highly biased.

5 answers

Plagarizer. http://www.wikihow.com/Evaluate-the-Credibility-of-a-Source

The answers are there, but you need to stop copying the wrong parts, and trying to baffle your readers with words. Your above answer is ridiculous, reading the question itself.
I am trying to find a correct answer and thought this might be it.

How about only one hypothesis has been tested
two traits, from the source you read:
lack of peer review, the author not being a respected source, and having an old publication date. That is three, choose two.

I am wondering (you don't have to answer), are you scanning material looking for the "answer", and nor reading/digesting the material? That is a lousy way to learn...regurgitating what others have said. Try to start to (at least in your mind) outline what you read, and as bullets, the authors main points, not her words.
I have no idea. Please help! :(
ANSWER:
two traits of an information source that may indicate the information given is scientifically unreliable is 1. the evidence used to support a scientific claim and 2. whether or not the source is biased.
Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 0 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. QuestionWhich purpose does a byline serve?(1 point) Responses It summarizes the information. It summarizes the information. It
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions