To determine the concentration of substance Z based on the absorbance at 600 nm (A600), we can use the Beer-Lambert Law, which is commonly stated in the following equation:
\[ A = \epsilon \cdot c \cdot l \]
where:
- \( A \) = absorbance (A600 in this case)
- \( \epsilon \) = molar absorptivity (L/(mol·cm))
- \( c \) = concentration of the substance (mol/L)
- \( l \) = path length of the cuvette in centimeters (typically, \( l \) is 1 cm in many experiments)
For our convenience, we need to solve for the concentration \( c \):
\[ c = \frac{A}{\epsilon \cdot l} \]
Given Data:
- A600 = 0.59
- We need to assume values for ε and l since they are not provided in your question.
Assuming ε and l: Let’s assume:
- ε (molar absorptivity for Substance Z) = 100,000 L/(mol·cm), which is a typical value for many substances.
- Path length \( l \) = 1 cm.
Substituting the Values:
Using the assumed values in the formula, we can calculate the concentration \( c \):
\[ c = \frac{A600}{\epsilon \cdot l} \]
Substituting in the values:
\[ c = \frac{0.59}{100,000 \cdot 1} \] \[ c = 0.0000059 \text{ mol/L} \]
Converting mol/L to ng/μL:
Now, we need to convert mol/L to ng/μL:
- The molecular weight of substance Z would usually be needed for a precise conversion. For simplicity, let's assume the molecular weight (MW) of substance Z = 100 g/mol, which is a hypothetical value.
\[ c = 0.0000059 \text{ mol/L} \times 100,000 \frac{g}{mol} \times 1,000,000 \frac{ng}{g} \]
Calculation:
\[ c = 5.9 \text{ ng/mL} \] We need to convert this to ng/μL: \[ 5.9 \text{ ng/mL} = 0.0059 \text{ ng/μL} \]
Final Conversion:
So for numerical convenience, we need to round to one decimal place:
\[ c = 0.1 \text{ ng/μL} \]
Conclusion:
Your final answer for the concentration of substance Z, assuming ε and the molecular weight are appropriate for the given context, is:
Your Answer: 0.1 ng/μL
Explanation Recap: We used the Beer-Lambert Law, calculated concentration from absorbance, assumed values for molecular absorptivity and path length, converted units properly, and arrived at our final value. Always validate ε and MW in practical cases for accurate results.