Use the table to answer the question. State Date of Admission to the Union Status of Slavery at the Time of Admission Ohio 1803 Free state Louisiana 1812 Slave-holding state Indiana 1816 Free state Mississippi 1817 Slave-holding state Illinois 1818 Free state Alabama 1819 Slave-holding state Maine 1820 Free state Missouri 1821 Slave-holding state What conclusion can be drawn from the table? (1 point) Responses The threat of European trade embargoes convinced state and federal leaders to outlaw slavery. The threat of European trade embargoes convinced state and federal leaders to outlaw slavery. The use of popular sovereignty to determine the legality of slavery deescalated sectional conflicts. The use of popular sovereignty to determine the legality of slavery deescalated sectional conflicts. The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states. The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states. The movement for the abolition of slavery grew in Southern states during the early nineteenth century. The movement for the abolition of slavery grew in Southern states during the early nineteenth century. Skip to navigation
3 answers
The conclusion that can be drawn from the table is: The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states.
This is evident from the alternating pattern of free and slave states being admitted to the Union, which contributed to the growing divide between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, leading to increased sectional tensions.
The answer is: The expansion of the United States increased tensions between free states and slave states.
