Yes, cities should be required to have detailed evacuation plans, especially in fire-prone areas like California. The passage mentions that only 22% of high-risk communities, including Paradise, have robust evacuation plans, which shows that many towns are unprepared. When disasters like the Camp Fire occur, the lack of planning can lead to tragic outcomes, such as the 85 deaths and people getting stuck in traffic trying to escape. Having a detailed plan would help ensure that residents can evacuate safely and efficiently during emergencies.
Use the passage to answer the question.
Many fire-prone California towns don’t plan for evacuations
Counterintuitive as it may sound, Paradise has some of the strongest evacuation planning in California. In fact, a USA TODAY Network-California survey of communities at high risk from wildfires found only 22% (including Paradise) have a robust, publicly available evacuation plan.
The scale of disaster in the Camp Fire was unprecedented, but the scene of people fleeing wildfires was familiar, repeated numerous times over the past three years up and down California from Redding and Paradise to Santa Rosa, Ventura, and Malibu.
In many of those communities, motorists became stuck in traffic as officials tried to evacuate thousands onto a few roads leading away from the flames.
NO REQUIREMENT TO PLAN
The 85 deaths and nearly 19,000 buildings destroyed in Paradise’s Camp Fire made it the deadliest and most destructive blaze in California history. Eight of those who perished were found in their vehicles, with two others found outside their vehicles.
In some spots, burned-out and abandoned vehicles lined roads leading out of town.
Should cities be required to have detailed evacuation plans? In 3–5 sentences, answer the question and provide specific textual evidence to support your analysis.
(4 points)
answer as a 7th-8th grader
1 answer
1 answer