Yes, cities should be required to have detailed evacuation plans because it can save lives during a fire. The passage says that only 22% of fire-prone towns have a good evacuation plan. This lack of planning led to many people getting stuck in traffic during the camp fire, making it harder for them to escape. If cities had better plans, it would help keep everyone safe when a fire happens.
Use the passage to answer the question
Many fire-prone California towns don't plan for evacuations
Counterintuitive as may sound, Paradise has some of the strongest evacuations planning in California. In fact, a USA TODAY Network-California survey of communities at high risk from wild fire found only 22% (including paradise) have a robust, publicly available evacuation plan.
The scale of disaster in the camp fire was unprecedented, but the scene of people fleeing wildfires was familiar, repeated numerous times over the past three years up and down California from Redding and Paradise to Santa Rosa, Ventura, and Malibu.
In many of those communities, motorists bacame stuck in traffic as officials tried to evacuate thousands onto few roads lead away from the flame.
NO REQUIREMENT TO PLAN
The 85 deaths and nearly 19,000 building destroyed in Paradise's camp fire made it the deadliest and most destructive blaze in California history. Eight of those who perished were found in their vehicles, with two others found outside their vehicles.
In some spots burned-out and abandoned vehicles lined leading out of town.
Should cities be required to have detailed evacuation plans? In 3-5 sentences, answer the question and provide specific textual evidence to support your analysis . make it short and write it like a 4th grader
3 answers
shorter
Yes, cities should have detailed evacuation plans to save lives during fires. The passage shows that only 22% of fire-prone towns have good plans, leading to traffic jams during evacuations. Better planning would help people escape safely in emergencies.
1 answer