Use the passage to answer the question. Analyze the passage. What choice best describes the author's point of view about Border Network for Human Rights? (1 point) Responses The author thinks the organization generally does too little for undocumented immigrants. The author thinks the organization generally does too little for undocumented immigrants. The author thinks the organization needs to acquire more experience in providing assistance. The author thinks the organization needs to acquire more experience in providing assistance. The author thinks the organization is a very useful resource for undocumented immigrants. The author thinks the organization is a very useful resource for undocumented immigrants. The author thinks the organization is a very useful for teaching civics but could do more to help families.

Answer 1

To accurately analyze the passage and determine the author's point of view about Border Network for Human Rights, we would need to look for specific indicators of the author's opinion, such as positive or negative language, descriptions of the organization's impact, and comparisons to other entities or initiatives.

Based on the options provided, if the author emphasizes the helpfulness, support, and effectiveness of the organization in assisting undocumented immigrants, the choice stating that "The author thinks the organization is a very useful resource for undocumented immigrants" could best reflect a positive viewpoint.

Alternatively, if the author critiques the organization and suggests it is lacking in certain areas, then options mentioning that the organization does too little or needs more experience would be more fitting.

If the passage suggests that the organization is beneficial but also points out areas where improvement is needed, then the last option—"The author thinks the organization is a very useful for teaching civics but could do more to help families"—may align with a balanced perspective.

Without the actual passage, it's challenging to definitively determine which option accurately captures the author's point of view, but the analysis should focus on the tone and content of the author's views on Border Network for Human Rights.