To accurately analyze the author's point of view about the Border Network for Human Rights, we would need to refer specifically to the details provided in the passage. However, based on the choices presented, if the passage emphasizes the organization's effectiveness and positive impact on undocumented immigrants, the best choice would be:
"The author thinks the organization is a very useful resource for undocumented immigrants."
If the passage criticized the organization for insufficient actions or needing improvement, a different choice like "The author thinks the organization generally does too little for undocumented immigrants" might be appropriate.
Without the passage itself, it's best to choose the option that most aligns with the overall tone and content of the text. Please refer to the passage for the most accurate response.