Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.
Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective.
On which fact do the two sources disagree?
(1 point)
Responses
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
1 answer
The fact on which the two sources disagree is:
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Source 1 emphasizes the necessity of participation from school districts for recycling programs to effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while Source 2 suggests that having many people involved can complicate the implementation of recycling programs and make them less effective.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer