Question

Use the information from the two sources to answer the question.

Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.

Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. 

On which fact do the two sources disagree? 

(1 point)
Responses

There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.

Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Skip to navigation

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
21 hours ago

The fact on which the two sources disagree is:

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.

Source 1 emphasizes the need for participation from a large number of people in school districts to make recycling effective, while Source 2 suggests that getting all students to follow a specific program is challenging, indicating that the large number of people can hinder effectiveness. They both recognize the challenge, but Source 1 is more optimistic about involvement, while Source 2 points out the difficulty of executing the program.