Use the information from the two sources to answer the question.

Question

Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.

Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. 

On which fact do the two sources disagree? 

(1 point)
Responses

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.

There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.

Answer 1

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness and feasibility of successful recycling programs in schools.

Source 1 implies that the participation of many people (i.e., school districts) is necessary for recycling to effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions, suggesting that a large number of participants can lead to a successful outcome.

In contrast, Source 2 highlights the challenges faced by schools in implementing recycling programs, mentioning that getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can lead to ineffectiveness.

Therefore, the correct response is:

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.