The missing reason in the proof is:
Vertical Angles Theorem
This is because m∠A and m∠E are vertical angles, which are congruent to each other. Therefore, the reason for statement 2 (m∠A = m∠E) is the Vertical Angles Theorem.
A vertical line is intersected by two parallel lines m and n forming eight angles.
Huy is working on a proof that consecutive interior angles are supplementary.
Statement Reason
1. m∠A+m∠C=180°
Linear pairs are supplementary
2. m∠A=m∠E
3. m∠E+m∠C=180°
Substitution
4. ∠E
and ∠C
are supplementary Definition of supplementary angles
What is the missing reason in the proof?
(1 point)
Responses
Definition of congruence
Definition of congruence
Vertical Angles Theorem
Vertical Angles Theorem
Transitive Property of Equality
Transitive Property of Equality
Corresponding Angles Postulate
Corresponding Angles Postulate
Skip to navigation
1 answer
The missing reason in the proof is:
Vertical Angles Theorem
This is because m∠A and m∠E are vertical angles, which are congruent to each other. Therefore, the reason for statement 2 (m∠A = m∠E) is the Vertical Angles Theorem.