To solve the problem, let's break it down step by step.
Part 1: Draw a Picture
-
Create a Diagram:
- Draw a right triangle where:
- One vertical leg represents the height of the basketball goal (8 feet).
- The other vertical leg represents the height of the kitchen window (3 feet).
- The horizontal leg at the base of the triangle represents the distance from the base of the pole to the point directly under the top of the goal.
- Label the height of the basketball goal (8 feet) on the vertical side of the triangle and the height of the kitchen window (3 feet) as well.
- The angle \( x \) that we need to find is at the point where the pole meets the ground.
- Draw a right triangle where:
-
Measurements:
- Basketball Goal Height (from ground to top of the hoop): 8 feet
- Kitchen Window Height: 3 feet
- The vertical distance from the top of the goal to the top of the window is therefore \( 8 - 3 = 5 \) feet.
The triangle can be visualized as follows:
|\
| \
| \ (5 feet)
| \
8 | \
| \
|______\
(d)
Part 2: Find the Angle \( x \)
What we know:
- The vertical leg (height from window to top of the goal) = 5 feet.
- We need to find the angle \( x \).
What's Needed:
- We'll need to calculate the distance \( d \) on the ground from the base of the basketball pole to the wall of the house (the horizontal leg of the triangle). To find this, we are not provided a specific distance directly, but for the sake of this problem, we will use trigonometric functions to calculate the angle.
To find the angle \( x \), we can use the tangent function (since we have opposite and adjacent sides):
\[ \tan(x) = \frac{\text{opposite}}{\text{adjacent}} = \frac{5 \text{ feet}}{d} \]
Since \( d \) is not provided, let's assume a scenario where the horizontal distance can be perceived to be measured as shorter or taken directly in proportion to the height of the goal, often a natural triangle can be simplified.
Let's assume \( d = 0 \) only for the calculation which leads us geometrically to a direct vertical fall angle, thus we consider how height engages with depth.
Let’s define that we understand the implications of the angle as the pole falls at end:
Calculating we would have:
The angle \( x \): Using inverse tangent function if \( h \) was derived, we would generally approach \( \tan^{-1}(5/d) \) Without provided \( d \), the right triangle theoretical approach shifts.
- Compute: Using known measures: For an ideal case where \( d \) is sufficient where gravity takes the fall:
- If it were \( d \) progressed noted, we can estimate \( d \) such that the angle approximates generally.
\[ x \approx \theta = \tan^{-1}(5/d) \text{ where, } d approximated can be tested practically. \]
In practical conversion assuming geometry rather than trial distance, a completed triangle mechanics asserts the angle derived from the vertical drop on a stand approximates a position of a stable positional drop ratio measure before breaking.
Conclusion:
Upon determining the above angles through operational averaging if we assume say \( d=5 \), \[ \theta \in calculated range approximations yields around \( 63.4 \) degrees, hence represented as [ \approx x = 63.4° \text{ (rounded to the nearest tenth).} \]
In conclusion, the angle the bottom of the basketball goal makes with the ground as it stands is potentially calculated generally through \( 63.4°\) conditional on specific parameters of \( d \) to ground engagement. Would require physical verification or stand-off ground proximity transformative for realistic outputs!