To accurately gather data for plotting a bacterial growth curve throughout the four phases (lag, log, stationary, and death), the most appropriate method from the options provided would be the plate count.
Here's a brief rationale for each method:
-
Plate Count: This method involves culturing bacteria on agar plates and counting the colonies that form. It provides a direct measure of viable cells (those capable of forming colonies) and can accurately reflect population changes during all growth phases.
-
Direct Microscopic Count: This involves counting bacteria under a microscope, but it may include both viable and non-viable cells, which can lead to inaccuracies, especially during the stationary and death phases.
-
Electronic Cell Counter: This provides a rapid count of cells but, similar to direct microscopic counting, it can count non-viable cells as well, which may not accurately reflect the actual population of viable bacteria.
-
Indirect Estimate Based on Turbidity: This method measures the cloudiness of a culture, which correlates with cell density. While it is an efficient method for estimating growth, it does not distinguish between live and dead cells and may be less reliable at lower cell densities or when cells clump together.
Considering these points, the plate count method is generally favored for its ability to provide accurate data on viable cell counts, making it the best choice for plotting a reliable bacterial growth curve throughout all growth phases.
1 answer