Aerial photography and direct counting from a helicopter are both methods used to determine the population size of large mammals in a given area. If we compare the two methods, we find that...

Question

Question 6 Answer

a.
aerial photography is time-consuming, whereas direct counting from a helicopter can be done in a short period of time.

b.
aerial photography can only cover a small area, whereas direct counting from a helicopter can cover a wide area.

c.
aerial photography is costly, whereas direct counting from a helicopter is cost effective.

d.
aerial photography is highly accurate, whereas direct counting from a helicopter has a high risk of human error.

Answer 1

The correct comparison between aerial photography and direct counting from a helicopter in determining the population size of large mammals is:

d. aerial photography is highly accurate, whereas direct counting from a helicopter has a high risk of human error.

This highlights the strengths of aerial photography in terms of providing a permanent visual record that can be analyzed for accuracy, while direct counting from a helicopter may be more prone to mistakes due to factors such as visibility and judgment calls made by the observer.