Asked by Dave

They systematic raiding of the Athapascans shows that organized warfare is most clearly identified with:

a. there is no record of either society initiating organized warfare

b. both farming and hunting societies

c. neither hunting nor farming societies

d. farming societies rather than hunting societies

e. hunting societies rather than farming societies


I am struggling between choice b and e. I know that the Athapascans were part of a hunting society. but i also think that it is more common in farming societies.

Answers

Answered by Reed
I'm not sure I can help much with this one. I tend to "e". Raiding other, unrelated, people for livestock and other valuables is/was common everywhere, not just in Alaska. It may, however, have been more common among nomadic tribes than more settled, agriculture-based economies. I'm no more certain than you as to what the "correct" answer will be when you turn it in. Sorry.
Answered by bobpursley
Anthropologists have studied anarchy and anarchy in groups for sometime now, I am uncertain any of them would draw a broad conclusion as to which any of the "answers" would university fit as a "clear" conclusion.
Answered by Reed
I think bobpursley is correct.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Related Questions