To determine the correct option regarding the significance of Points 1 and 2 in Charlie's explanation of the SSS (Side-Side-Side) Congruence Theorem, let's analyze the statements:
For triangles △ABC and △DEF, Charlie has identified three pairs of congruent sides: AB ≅ DE, BC ≅ EF, and AC ≅ DF. When he translated and rotated △ABC to create △A"B"C", he ensured that certain segments coincide and created circles centered at points D and E with the respective radii.
Now, let's examine each option:
-
Option #1: It states that Points 1 and 2 are both a distance EF away from point E and a distance DF away from point D. This implies that Points 1 and 2 lie along the arc of a circle drawn around D with radius DF and a circle around E with radius EF. This option suggests that these points are determined by distances related to the specific sides that are congruent to each other.
-
Option #2: Similarly, this option indicates that Points 1 and 2 are both a distance ED away from point E and a distance FE away from point F. This doesn't fit, because ED is not one of the congruent side lengths; ED should correspond to side wraps of the triangles.
-
Option #3: This states that Points 1 and 2 are both a distance EF away from point E and a distance FE away from point F. Since EF and FE are the same length (as they are congruent sides), this is a valid statement. However, FE refers to the same length as EF, which doesn’t contribute to distinguishing the distances correctly.
Given the descriptions, the best option is:
Option #1: They are the only points in the plane that are both a distance EF away from point E and a distance DF away from point D.
This accurately captures the significance of those points relative to the congruent sides discussed in the SSS theorem.