Asked by Gates

The Second Amendment continues to be a controversial issue. One of the main questions is whether it was meant as a _______ freedom or _______ freedom.

Question 4 options:

individual; group

absolute; conditional

temporary; permanent

good; bad

Answers

Answered by Ms. Sue
Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

What do you think?
Answered by sammie
is it individual and group freedom?
Answered by Gates
Yeah is it individual and group freedom?
Answered by Reed
That is probably the "correct" answer. It's also a matter of some significant debate as to whether it is absolute or conditional, in how to interpret the "well regulated" wording.
Answered by Reed
Note, however, that the Supreme Court had always ruled that it was not an unfettered individual right, but a right to have a "militia". The Court reversed itself very recently, ruling that it is, indeed, an individual right. The controversy goes on.
Answered by Ms. Sue
I see only group terms in this amendment.

Militia and people refer to groups, so I think the debate is whether it was intended for individuals or groups.

Obviously it was intended for groups.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Related Questions