Asked by Lis
                the problem reads this "A person with mass m1 = 62 kg stands at the left end of a uniform beam with mass m2 = 93 kg and a length L = 3.5 m. Another person with mass m3 = 65 kg stands on the far right end of the beam and holds a medicine ball with mass m4 = 10 kg (assume that the medicine ball is at the far right end of the beam as well). Let the origin of our coordinate system be the left end of the original position of the beam as shown in the drawing. Assume there is no friction between the beam and floor. 
What is the new x-position of the person at the left end of the beam? (How far did the beam move when the ball was throw from person to person?) "
I know we have to do something like 1.822826=[(60+100d]+93(1.75+d)+65(3.5+d)/230
(btw 1.822826 is the location of center of mass)
I keep getting d=.1271928947 but it's wrong, can someone double check my work please
            
        What is the new x-position of the person at the left end of the beam? (How far did the beam move when the ball was throw from person to person?) "
I know we have to do something like 1.822826=[(60+100d]+93(1.75+d)+65(3.5+d)/230
(btw 1.822826 is the location of center of mass)
I keep getting d=.1271928947 but it's wrong, can someone double check my work please
Answers
                    Answered by
            R_scott
            
    the error could be related to significant figures
... just because the calculator shows them, doesn't mean they are there
all of the data in the problem is 2 sig fig
... except for the mass of the ball, which is one sig fig
assuming the ball is exactly 10 kg
... the best the answer can be is two sig fig
... yours looks like 10 ... like a calculator display
    
... just because the calculator shows them, doesn't mean they are there
all of the data in the problem is 2 sig fig
... except for the mass of the ball, which is one sig fig
assuming the ball is exactly 10 kg
... the best the answer can be is two sig fig
... yours looks like 10 ... like a calculator display
                    Answered by
            Lis
            
    I also tried cutting it down to .13 but that was wrong, the website that I use sometimes wants us to be 99%accurate so it'll want more numbers than needed
I think this might be a calculation error on my part
    
I think this might be a calculation error on my part
                    Answered by
            Damon
            
    total mass = 231
original cg = [93*1.75 + 75*3.5 ]/231 = 1.841
new cg = [93*1.75 + 65*3.5]/231 =1.689
so the rod moved 0.152
    
original cg = [93*1.75 + 75*3.5 ]/231 = 1.841
new cg = [93*1.75 + 65*3.5]/231 =1.689
so the rod moved 0.152
                    Answered by
            Lis
            
    thank you damon, I was using the wrong numbers :)
    
                    Answered by
            Damon
            
    You are welcome.
    
                                                    There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
                                            
                Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.