The two sources disagree on the fact that "Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people." Source 1 emphasizes the necessity of participation from school districts to effectively impact the environment, while Source 2 suggests that getting all students to follow a specific program is challenging and can lead to ineffectiveness, implying that participation may not be as feasible or successful.
Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment. Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use theif district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. On which fact do the two sources disagree? (1 point) Recycling programs in schools damage the environment. Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people. There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
1 answer