Use the information from the two sources to answer the question. Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment. Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. On which fact do the two sources disagree? (1 point) Responses There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan. There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan. Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people. Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people. There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
19 hours ago

The fact on which the two sources disagree is:

"Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people."

Source 1 emphasizes the necessity of participation from school districts for recycling efforts to be effective, while Source 2 highlights the challenges of getting all students to follow a specific program, implying that participation may not be as successful or straightforward as suggested in Source 1.