The best comparison of the theory that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households is with the response: Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had. This response directly addresses the disparities in treatment and status between enslaved individuals and free members of society, highlighting important distinctions in their experiences and the nature of the benefits they might receive.
Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)
Responses
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
1 answer
1 answer