Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.

Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

Other historians believe that enslaved people were

Answer 1

treated primarily as property and that any perceived benefits were minimal compared to their lack of freedom and autonomy. Other historians argue that while some enslaved individuals may have had better living conditions or opportunities within certain households, these advantages were not universal and did not outweigh the fundamental injustices of their status as enslaved persons. This perspective emphasizes the harsh realities of enslavement and critiques the idea that integration into households offered significant or equitable benefits.