Research Proposal: Identifying Factors Contributing to Gender-Based Violence on Campus
Ethical Considerations
When conducting research on sensitive topics like Gender-Based Violence (GBV) on campus, several ethical considerations must be prioritized to protect both the researchers and the participants involved in the study. Below are the key ethical considerations and the measures to minimize risks:
-
Voluntary Participation: Participation in the research must be entirely voluntary. Participants should be informed that they can withdraw from the study at any time without any consequences.
Steps to Minimize Risks: Clear information regarding the voluntary nature of the study will be provided in writing prior to participation. Researchers will ensure that participants understand they may cease participation at any moment.
-
No Harm to Participants: The research should avoid any physical, psychological, or emotional harm to participants. Given the sensitive nature of GBV, researchers must be especially mindful of triggers or distress that may arise during data collection.
Steps to Minimize Risks: Researchers will provide support resources, such as counseling services, and create a safe and respectful environment for discussions.
-
Informed Consent: Participants must be adequately informed about the purpose of the study, what their participation involves, and any potential risks or benefits before giving consent.
Steps to Minimize Risks: A comprehensive consent form will be developed that outlines all relevant information. Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions and must provide explicit consent.
-
Anonymity: Participants’ identities should be protected to ensure confidentiality and to encourage open and honest responses.
Steps to Minimize Risks: Researchers will assign coded identifiers to participants and avoid capturing any personally identifiable information. Data will be stored securely and reported only in aggregate form.
-
Deception: Any use of deception must be minimized and justified. Participants should be made aware of the study’s true purpose to the extent possible.
Steps to Minimize Risks: If deception is necessary for the study's objectives, a careful justification will be provided in the research protocol, and debriefing will occur post-participation.
-
Analysis and Reporting: Researchers must present findings accurately and responsibly. Misrepresentation of data could harm individuals or groups; therefore, it is crucial to avoid biases in reporting results.
Steps to Minimize Risks: Peer reviews will be sought, and findings will be shared with participants and relevant advocacy groups before publication.
-
Institutional Review Boards (IRB): The research must be reviewed and approved by an IRB to ensure that ethical standards are met.
Steps to Minimize Risks: The researchers will submit all materials, including consent forms and procedures, for IRB review and will adhere to any feedback or requests made by the board.
-
Professional Ethics: Researchers must adhere to their professional codes of ethics throughout the research process.
Steps to Minimize Risks: Researchers will remain updated on relevant ethical standards within their disciplines and take appropriate measures to integrate these practices throughout the study.
-
Debriefing: Following participation, it is important to debrief participants to clarify any misconceptions, offer additional information, and provide them with support resources if needed.
Steps to Minimize Risks: A structured debriefing session will be conducted to ensure participants leave the study feeling informed and supported.
Summary of Ethics
The ethical considerations in researching Gender-Based Violence on campus are crucial for protecting participants from harm and maintaining the integrity of the research process. Ensuring voluntary participation, informed consent, and the anonymity of participants are foundational principles. Researchers must also be vigilant in preventing deception and misrepresentation of findings while adhering to established professional ethics. Institutional review involves scrutiny from an IRB to uphold ethical standards, while debriefing facilitates participant support post-study. By proactively addressing these ethical concerns, researchers can responsibly navigate the sensitive context of GBV on campus while contributing valuable insights to the field.