Read the following excerpt from Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka: “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment . . . ..” Describe the political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals through this court case. (1 point) Responses

Question

Interest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme Court. Interest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme Court. Social movements demonstrated in large groups. Social movements demonstrated in large groups. Congress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness. Congress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness. Interest groups create political alliances with parties.

Answer 1

The political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals in the Brown v. Board of Education case involved interest groups litigating unfair laws in the Supreme Court. The case arose from efforts by civil rights organizations, such as the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), to challenge the legality of racial segregation in public schools. By utilizing the judicial system, these interest groups aimed to demonstrate that the doctrine of "separate but equal" was fundamentally flawed and violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This strategy sought to achieve legal recognition of equal rights and to dismantle institutionalized racism through the courts.