Paraphrase this:
Children from affluent schools know more, stay in school longer, and end up with better jobs than children from schools that enroll mostly poor children. Children who live in affluent neighborhoods also get into less trouble with the law and have fewer illegitimate children than children who live in poor neighborhoods. Similar patterns are found when we compare white neighborhoods to black neighborhoods. These patterns have convinced many social scientists, policy analysts, and ordinary citizens that a neighborhood or school's social composition really influences children's life chances. But this need not be the case. The differences we observe could simply reflect the fact that children from affluent families do better than children from poor families no matter where they live. Similarly, white children may fare better than black children regardless of their neighborhood's racial mix. In order to determine how much a neighborhood or school's mean socioeconomic status (SES) affects a child's life chances, we need to compare children from similar families who grew up in different kinds of neighborhoods. This study examines what social scientists have learned from studies of this kind. We give considerable attention to the policy implications of the studies we discuss. Many observers (notably W. Wilson, 1987) believe that when poor children have predominantly poor neighbors, their chances of escaping from poverty decline. If this is so, a strong case can be made for governmental efforts to reduce the geographic isolation of poor children. Yet such evidence as we have suggests that the poor—or at least poor blacks
1 answer