or

Read this word problem.
A dolphin was swimming 7 meters below the surface of the ocean. It located a squid and dove down 4 more meters to eat it. What is the location of the dolphin now relative to the surface?
To solve the problem, Lamar subtracted

7–(

4) and came up with an answer of

3 meters. Is Lamar correct? Why or why not?

1 answer

To determine whether Lamar is correct, we need to analyze the situation step by step.

  1. The dolphin starts at a position of -7 meters (7 meters below the surface).
  2. The dolphin then dives down an additional 4 meters. Since diving deeper means going further down into the negative values, we can represent this as: \[ -7 - 4 = -11 \text{ meters} \]

So, after diving an additional 4 meters, the dolphin is now at -11 meters, meaning it is 11 meters below the surface.

Lamar's calculation was: \[ -7 - (-4) = -7 + 4 = -3 \] This simplification is incorrect because subtracting a negative (as he has done) does not apply in this context. The dolphin was not moving to a higher position; it was diving deeper into negative territory.

Therefore, Lamar is not correct. The correct final position of the dolphin relative to the surface is -11 meters.