Question
Read the problem below. The problem was solved incorrectly. Solve the problem correctly. Then explain the error that was made.
Problem
3x + 2x - 6 = 24
-2x-2x
X-6=24
+6
+6
X = 30
Problem
3x + 2x - 6 = 24
-2x-2x
X-6=24
+6
+6
X = 30
Answers
GPT-4o mini
Let's solve the equation correctly first:
The original equation is:
\[ 3x + 2x - 6 = 24 \]
1. Combine like terms on the left side:
\[ (3x + 2x) - 6 = 24 \]
\[ 5x - 6 = 24 \]
2. Add 6 to both sides to isolate the term with \(x\):
\[ 5x - 6 + 6 = 24 + 6 \]
\[ 5x = 30 \]
3. Divide both sides by 5 to solve for \(x\):
\[ x = \frac{30}{5} \]
\[ x = 6 \]
So, the correct solution is:
\[ x = 6 \]
### Explanation of the Error:
In the initial incorrect solution, the expression was mismanaged. The steps outlined do not correctly follow the basic properties of equality or algebra. Here are some specific errors:
1. **Combining terms incorrectly**: The initial step shows an assumption that \( -2x - 2x \) (which is unclear) was a step to reduce the left side; however, the expression actually contained \(3x + 2x - 6\). The terms needed to be combined properly as \(5x - 6\).
2. **Misinterpretation of equality**: The transformation from \(5x - 6 = 24\) to \(X - 6 = 24\) was not valid. The variable was not isolated correctly.
3. **Incorrect operations**: The conclusion of \(X = 30\) suggests a misunderstanding of operations when solving for \(x\). The variable should have been simplified and solved from \(5x = 30\) to \(x = 6\), instead of directly jumping to \(X = 30\).
Overall, the mistakes stemmed from improper algebraic manipulation and misunderstanding of solving simple linear equations.
The original equation is:
\[ 3x + 2x - 6 = 24 \]
1. Combine like terms on the left side:
\[ (3x + 2x) - 6 = 24 \]
\[ 5x - 6 = 24 \]
2. Add 6 to both sides to isolate the term with \(x\):
\[ 5x - 6 + 6 = 24 + 6 \]
\[ 5x = 30 \]
3. Divide both sides by 5 to solve for \(x\):
\[ x = \frac{30}{5} \]
\[ x = 6 \]
So, the correct solution is:
\[ x = 6 \]
### Explanation of the Error:
In the initial incorrect solution, the expression was mismanaged. The steps outlined do not correctly follow the basic properties of equality or algebra. Here are some specific errors:
1. **Combining terms incorrectly**: The initial step shows an assumption that \( -2x - 2x \) (which is unclear) was a step to reduce the left side; however, the expression actually contained \(3x + 2x - 6\). The terms needed to be combined properly as \(5x - 6\).
2. **Misinterpretation of equality**: The transformation from \(5x - 6 = 24\) to \(X - 6 = 24\) was not valid. The variable was not isolated correctly.
3. **Incorrect operations**: The conclusion of \(X = 30\) suggests a misunderstanding of operations when solving for \(x\). The variable should have been simplified and solved from \(5x = 30\) to \(x = 6\), instead of directly jumping to \(X = 30\).
Overall, the mistakes stemmed from improper algebraic manipulation and misunderstanding of solving simple linear equations.
3x + 2x - 6 = 24
GPT-4o mini
Let's solve the equation step-by-step correctly:
Given:
\[ 3x + 2x - 6 = 24 \]
### Step 1: Combine Like Terms
First, combine \(3x\) and \(2x\):
\[
5x - 6 = 24
\]
### Step 2: Add 6 to Both Sides
Next, add \(6\) to both sides to isolate the term with \(x\):
\[
5x - 6 + 6 = 24 + 6
\]
\[
5x = 30
\]
### Step 3: Divide by 5
Finally, divide both sides by \(5\) to solve for \(x\):
\[
x = \frac{30}{5}
\]
\[
x = 6
\]
### Conclusion
Thus, the solution to the equation \(3x + 2x - 6 = 24\) is:
\[
\boxed{6}
\]
If you have more questions or need clarifications, feel free to ask!
Given:
\[ 3x + 2x - 6 = 24 \]
### Step 1: Combine Like Terms
First, combine \(3x\) and \(2x\):
\[
5x - 6 = 24
\]
### Step 2: Add 6 to Both Sides
Next, add \(6\) to both sides to isolate the term with \(x\):
\[
5x - 6 + 6 = 24 + 6
\]
\[
5x = 30
\]
### Step 3: Divide by 5
Finally, divide both sides by \(5\) to solve for \(x\):
\[
x = \frac{30}{5}
\]
\[
x = 6
\]
### Conclusion
Thus, the solution to the equation \(3x + 2x - 6 = 24\) is:
\[
\boxed{6}
\]
If you have more questions or need clarifications, feel free to ask!
Demetrius can spend as much as `\$50` on shirts.
Shirts, `s`, cost `\$16` each at a nearby store.
Shirts, `s`, cost `\$16` each at a nearby store.
GPT-4o mini
To find out how many shirts Demetrius can buy with a budget of \$50, we can set up the equation using the cost of each shirt.
1. **Let \( s \)** be the number of shirts Demetrius can buy.
2. Each shirt costs \$16, so the total cost of \( s \) shirts is \( 16s \).
3. Since he can spend no more than \$50, we can write the following inequality:
\[
16s \leq 50
\]
### Step 1: Solve the Inequality
To find out how many shirts he can afford, divide both sides of the inequality by 16:
\[
s \leq \frac{50}{16}
\]
Calculating \( \frac{50}{16} \):
\[
\frac{50}{16} = 3.125
\]
Since \( s \) must be a whole number (you can't buy a fraction of a shirt), we take the largest whole number that is less than or equal to 3.125:
\[
s \leq 3
\]
### Conclusion
Demetrius can buy a maximum of **3 shirts** with his budget of \$50.
### Verification:
- Cost for 3 shirts:
\[
3 \times 16 = 48
\]
- Cost for 4 shirts:
\[
4 \times 16 = 64
\]
Since \$48 is within the budget and \$64 exceeds it, the conclusion is confirmed. Thus, the maximum number of shirts he can buy is:
\[
\boxed{3}
\]
1. **Let \( s \)** be the number of shirts Demetrius can buy.
2. Each shirt costs \$16, so the total cost of \( s \) shirts is \( 16s \).
3. Since he can spend no more than \$50, we can write the following inequality:
\[
16s \leq 50
\]
### Step 1: Solve the Inequality
To find out how many shirts he can afford, divide both sides of the inequality by 16:
\[
s \leq \frac{50}{16}
\]
Calculating \( \frac{50}{16} \):
\[
\frac{50}{16} = 3.125
\]
Since \( s \) must be a whole number (you can't buy a fraction of a shirt), we take the largest whole number that is less than or equal to 3.125:
\[
s \leq 3
\]
### Conclusion
Demetrius can buy a maximum of **3 shirts** with his budget of \$50.
### Verification:
- Cost for 3 shirts:
\[
3 \times 16 = 48
\]
- Cost for 4 shirts:
\[
4 \times 16 = 64
\]
Since \$48 is within the budget and \$64 exceeds it, the conclusion is confirmed. Thus, the maximum number of shirts he can buy is:
\[
\boxed{3}
\]
Related Questions
Read the problem below. The problem was solved incorrectly. Find the error that was made and explain...
questions 5: Error analysis
read the problem below the problem was solved incorrectly. find the e...
Read the problem below. The problem was solved incorrectly. Solve the problem. correctly. Then expla...
Read the problem below the problem was solved incorrectly solve the problem correctly then explain t...