New Nation, Civil War, Reconstruction (7L5.TEST)

States and Year of Admission:

- Ohio (1803)
- Free state

- Louisiana (1812)
- Slave-holding state

- Indiana (1816)
- Free state

- Mississippi (1817)
- Slave-holding state

- Illinois (1818)
- Free state

- Alabama (1819)
- Slave-holding state

- Maine (1820)
- Free state

- Missouri (1821)
- Slave-holding state

Question:
What conclusion can be drawn from the table? (1 point)

A. The threat of European trade embargoes convinced state and federal leaders to outlaw slavery.

B. The movement for the abolition of slavery grew in Southern states during the early nineteenth century.

C. The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states.

D. The use of popular sovereignty to determine the legality of slavery deescalated sectional conflicts.

1 answer

The conclusion that can be drawn from the table is:

C. The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states.

This conclusion is supported by the pattern of admissions of free and slave-holding states, which illustrates the growing sectional divide over the issue of slavery as new states were added to the Union.

Similar Questions
  1. The main goal of Reconstruction was toA.Readmit the former Confederate states into the Union. B.Revive the economies of the
    1. answers icon 12 answers
  2. Which statement best describes Reconstruction?O the expansion of the United States prior to the Civil War O the period of
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Which of the following statements about nation-states is accurate?(1 point)Responses In the modern world, most countries are
    1. answers icon 3 answers
  4. Sectionalism and the Civil War TestWhich of the following best shows how the issue of states’ rights contributed to the onset
    1. answers icon 2 answers
more similar questions