Misha writes the following proof that two distinct lines, l

Question

and n
, with the same slope, m
, are parallel. She uses a proof by contradiction. Which step did she do incorrectly?

Assume that distinct lines l
and n
have the same slope, m
, but are not parallel.
Let l
have the equation y=mx+b
and n
have the equation y=mx+c
. In order to be distinct lines, it must be true that b≠c
.
Since they are assumed to not be parallel, they must have a point of intersection.
Set the equations for l
and n
equal to each other and solve to find the x
-coordinate of the point of intersection.
Setting mx+b
equal to mx+c
results in b=c
, which contradicts the condition that b≠c
.
Therefore the assumption that two distinct lines with the same slope are not parallel is incorrect. It must be true that two distinct lines with the same slope are parallel.
(1 point)
Responses

Misha did all steps correctly.
Misha did all steps correctly.

Step 3 is incorrect. The lines do not need to have a point of intersection since they are not parallel.
Step 3 is incorrect. The lines do not need to have a point of intersection since they are not parallel.

Step 5 is incorrect. Both equations need to be solved for x
first, then set equal to each other in order to directly solve for the x
-intercept.
Step 5 is incorrect. Both equations need to be solved for x first, then set equal to each other in order to directly solve for the x-intercept.

Step 2 is incorrect. In order to be distinct lines, it must be true that b=c
.
Step 2 is incorrect. In order to be distinct lines, it must be true that b is equal to c.
Skip to navigation

Answer 1

Misha's proof contains an incorrect step in her reasoning.

The error lies in Step 3. In this step, she assumes that since lines \( l \) and \( n \) are distinct, and they have the same slope, they must intersect at some point. However, this is incorrect because if two distinct lines have the same slope but different y-intercepts (which is indicated by \( b \neq c \)), they cannot intersect at all; they are parallel by definition. So, there is no point of intersection, which contradicts her assumption that they must intersect.

Therefore, the correct response is:

Step 3 is incorrect. The lines do not need to have a point of intersection since they are not parallel.