Judiciary and Civil Liberties Unit Test

Which statement best identifies how the decision in the United States v. Eichmann case was a result of constitutional interpretation? (1 point)
• The Supreme Court followed the Constitution exactly and no interpretations were made in this case
• Flag burning is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form of expression in the U.S. v. Eichmann case.
• The Supreme Court reconsidered the language of the Fourteenth Amendment.
• The Supreme Court used the Flag Protection Act to make a decision

1 answer

The statement that best identifies how the decision in the United States v. Eichman case was a result of constitutional interpretation is:

• Flag burning is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form of expression in the U.S. v. Eichmann case.

Similar Questions
  1. Judiciary and Civil Liberties Unit TestWhat is the purpose of including the following clauses in the U.S. Constitution: habeas
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Judiciary and Civil Liberties Unit TestWhat is the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion? (1 point) •
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Judiciary and Civil Liberties Unit TestWhen the Supreme Court finishes the process of reviewing a case, what is the final step
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Judiciary and Civil Liberties Unit TestHow is the Supreme Court able to resolve policy differences between the legislative
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions