John uses mechanical "predators" to approach frogs at a pond shore, and he records the distance between predator and frog as the frogs jump. (PEER REVIEW)

On a walk around pond John sees that small frogs on the shore only allow him to get within 5 feet before jumping into the water. (DATA COLLECTION)

John runs some statics on his distances to see if he can find any significance in his study. (OBSERVATION)

John writes up and sends out his experimental results for other scientisits to critique. (ANALYSIS)

John thinks that frogs vary the proximity to which they allow predators to approach based on the size of the predator. (HYPOTHESIS)

----
Can anyone tell me if I did this right?
I had to match the word from word bank that best matches.

[word bank: HYPOTHESIS, OBSERVATION, DATA COLLECTION, PEER REVIEW)

if there are any incorrect answers, please correct me so that I could study more with right answers. thank you!

1 answer

Are you just guessing?

1. What peers are mentioned? Not frogs. Data

2. Observation

3. "statics" or statistics? Although "Analysis" is not listed in your word bank, it applies here.

4. What are other scientists considered to be?

5. This is the only one you got right.