• It is not uncommon that students leave the class with more confusion than clarity. By “confusion”, I do not mean a lack of understanding of the concepts. I mean instead the feeling of being pulled in several directions and not knowing where to side. I mean the feeling of a seesaw mind that sides with one position only to hear an opposing position and siding with that.

Is it worthwhile to address these confusions, or are they better off ignored? If you choose to address them, they how will you do so? By what means will you shape your answer to these questions?

3 answers

What do you think? Ignore or discuss it? Or write a lecture on the topic? What would you do? And why, from the philosophical points of view you have studied.

You can do it, TayB!!!
I'm logging of the 'puter now, to read an essay on philosophy, by chance. :) I'll check in the morning to see if you have posted any more on this question.
Out of chaos, comes understanding. At least, for the Gestalts. Now in my experience, gestalt thinking does not start to take place on a large scale until one leaves the concrete domain of thinking...

https://visuallygifted.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-gestalt-learner/