In what way does the article contrast the arguments for cursive with the arguments against cursive?

Question

Those for cursive insist on its modern relevance, while those against cursive point to greater lesson retention with typed notes.
Those for cursive say it is faster than typing, while those against cursive point out that most school materials are in print form.
Those for cursive point to mental benefits, while those against cursive say class time should be spent on more important subjects.
Those for cursive point to greater lesson retention, while those against cursive insist printing is faster than cursive writing.

Answer 1

Overall, the article contrasts the arguments for cursive by highlighting its modern relevance, speed, and mental benefits, while contrasting them against arguments against cursive which emphasize lesson retention with typed notes, the dominance of print materials, and the importance of spending class time on more essential subjects.