What does each side think is most important in the cursive debate? Compare their arguments. Then, state your opinion about teaching cursive in school. Use both evidence from the article and your own reasoning to support your ideas.Want ideas for words that help compare? Look at this table.

Answer 1

On one side of the cursive debate, proponents argue that teaching cursive is important for historical and cultural reasons. They believe that cursive is a traditional form of writing that has been used for centuries and is important for preserving our cultural heritage. Additionally, they argue that learning cursive can improve fine motor skills and hand-eye coordination.

On the other side of the debate, opponents argue that cursive is outdated and unnecessary in the digital age. They believe that the time spent teaching cursive could be better spent teaching students more relevant skills, such as typing or coding. Critics also argue that cursive is difficult to read and write, and that most communication is now done electronically.

In my opinion, I believe that teaching cursive in school is still important. While it may be true that cursive is not as commonly used in everyday life as it once was, it still holds cultural and historical significance. Learning cursive can also help improve fine motor skills and hand-eye coordination, which are valuable skills to develop. Additionally, being able to read and write cursive is still a useful skill to have, as there are still many documents and historical texts that are written in cursive. Overall, I believe that teaching cursive in school can help students develop important skills and better understand our cultural heritage.