The detail about the students' lawyer, Dan Johnston, arguing that the school district had allowed other forms of political speech—including political buttons without resulting in riots or upheavals—was included to demonstrate that other types of political speech did not lead to disruption. This supports the argument that the students' symbolic speech (wearing armbands) should be treated similarly and not be restricted, as it had not caused any disturbances in the past.
In the Court case tinker verse des molnes why did the author include this detail in the article the students lawyer Dan Johnston argued that the school district had allowed other forms of political speech in school including political buttons no riots or upheavals resulted
To demonstrate that other types of political speech did not lead to disrupt
To support the school rule preventing all forms of political
To prove that the school had a history of major description descriptions do to political speech
To disagree with the school about allowing all forms of political speech on school grounds
1 answer