In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted? (1 point)

Answer 1

In the case of Roe v. Wade, judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted because it involved the interpretation of constitutional rights and the balancing of individual liberties against state interests. The Court needed to determine whether the right to privacy, which is implied in the Constitution, extends to a woman's decision to have an abortion. The Supreme Court's role is to ensure that laws and state policies comply with constitutional protections, and in this case, the justices needed to evaluate the legality of Texas laws that severely restricted abortion access in light of the broader constitutional framework. This case exemplified the judicial system's responsibility to protect fundamental rights and uphold the rule of law when such rights are challenged by governmental authority.