In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted? (1 point)

Answer 1

In the case of Roe v. Wade, judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted primarily to ensure the protection of individual rights and to uphold the Constitution. The Court needed to address the conflict between state laws regulating abortion and the constitutional right to privacy, which is implied in several amendments, including the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. By exercising judicial review, the Supreme Court could assess whether the laws enacted by states were in line with constitutional protections, ultimately leading to the landmark decision that established a woman's legal right to choose an abortion. This involvement was necessary to maintain the balance of power and protect fundamental rights against potentially unconstitutional state actions.