In Reno v. Condon, Attorney General of South Carolina, the case in the book addressing

Question

whether Congress could prohibit states from selling personal information of citizens
without consent, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
a. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the First Amendment.
b. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.
c. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.
d. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Regulatory Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
e. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was not a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.