Asked by bev
In ACLU v. Ashcroft (2002), the Supreme Court ruled:
A. that the Child Online Protection Act went too far in restricting speech.
B. that the Child Online Protection Act was constitutional.
C. that the Communications Decency Act protected free-speech rights.
D. that neither Act went far enough to protect children.
C?
A. that the Child Online Protection Act went too far in restricting speech.
B. that the Child Online Protection Act was constitutional.
C. that the Communications Decency Act protected free-speech rights.
D. that neither Act went far enough to protect children.
C?
Answers
Answered by
Reed
No, not C.
And I think you mean Ashcroft v. ACLU (2004).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union
And I think you mean Ashcroft v. ACLU (2004).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.