I'm having a tough time with these two questions. I think I have it, based on the indicator, but I'm not positive that the reason that I listed is correct.

Argument:
1) Anything is possible (you agree?)
Therefore, it must be possible that something is impossible.

This is a contradiction - NOT everything is possible BECAUSE anything is possible.

1) Where is the main idea in this argument scheme?

2) Where are the reasons?

-------

1) after therefore: It must be possible that something is impossible.
2)anything is possible ... ?

Thank you!

2 answers

I think you're right.

Thank you, Reed!